Client satisfaction Jaya Counsel
Client Experiences

What Clients Share
About Working With Us

Franchise matters can be complicated. These are some of the experiences clients have shared after working through registration, agreements, and disputes with Jaya Counsel.

← Back to Home
14

Years in Franchise Law

340+

Engagements Completed

4.8

Average Client Rating

92%

Dispute Settlements Out-of-Court

Client Reviews

Testimonials from Our Clients

HI

Hazwan bin Ismail

Franchisor · Shah Alam, Selangor

"We were expanding from a single outlet to a proper franchise system and genuinely did not know where to begin with the Registrar requirements. Jaya Counsel walked us through the disclosure document preparation step by step. The process took about ten weeks, which matched what we had been told to expect. Nothing fell through the cracks."

February 2026 · Franchise Registration

PC

Patricia Chong Mei Lin

Franchisee · Georgetown, Penang

"I was signing a franchise agreement as a franchisee and wanted someone to review what I was being asked to agree to, particularly the termination clause and the non-compete terms. The team at Jaya Counsel flagged a few points that the other side subsequently agreed to revise. I felt considerably more comfortable signing after that review."

January 2026 · Agreement Review

MR

Mohd Ridhwan Yusof

Franchisor · Johor Bahru, Johor

"We had a territorial dispute with a franchisee who we believed was operating outside his designated area. Jaya Counsel helped us document the matter clearly, sent the appropriate correspondence, and the situation was resolved through mediation without going to court. The process was slower than I hoped, but the outcome was acceptable and the legal costs stayed within what was quoted."

December 2025 · Dispute Advisory

SK

Siti Khadijah binti Osman

Franchisor · Kuala Lumpur

"We are a home-grown food and beverage franchise and needed to draft agreements for our first three franchisees. Jaya Counsel prepared a template we could adapt going forward, and took the time to explain why each clause was included. The delivery was within the timeframe discussed and the document covered things I had not thought to ask for."

February 2026 · Agreement Drafting

TK

Tan Kah Keong

Area Developer · Ipoh, Perak

"I took on an area development agreement to operate multiple outlets across Perak and wanted a proper review before committing. The team identified that the exclusivity boundaries were not clearly defined and helped negotiate clearer language. Communication was prompt and they were straightforward about what was and was not worth contesting."

January 2026 · Agreement Negotiation

NF

Nurul Farhana Abdul Razak

Franchisee · Petaling Jaya, Selangor

"My franchisor attempted to terminate my agreement under circumstances I considered unfair. Jaya Counsel reviewed the agreement and the notices sent, and advised me that the termination procedure had not followed the contractual requirements. They wrote to the franchisor and the matter was subsequently resolved without my outlet closing. I am grateful for the measured way the matter was handled."

March 2026 · Dispute Advisory

Case Studies

Selected Client Outcomes

Case Study 01

Foreign F&B Franchisor — Malaysian Market Entry

The Situation

An international food and beverage brand sought to enter the Malaysian market through a master franchise arrangement. The client had limited familiarity with the Franchise Act 1998 and needed both registration assistance and a compliant master franchise agreement drafted within a defined commercial timeline.

What We Did

We conducted a registration readiness assessment, prepared the franchise disclosure documents to meet Registrar requirements, and drafted a master franchise agreement covering territorial rights, sub-franchising parameters, fee structures, and brand usage provisions. The registration and agreement were completed concurrently over eleven weeks.

The Outcome

Registration was approved within the standard window. The master franchisee executed the agreement within the client's target date. The brand launched its first Malaysian outlet six months later with a compliant documentation structure in place. The client has since returned for three sub-franchisee agreement reviews.

Case Study 02

Retail Franchise — Multi-Party Territory Dispute

The Situation

A retail franchisor contacted us after two franchisees, operating in adjacent areas, raised competing territorial exclusivity claims. The original agreements contained ambiguous boundary definitions and the relationship between the parties had deteriorated to the point where both franchisees were threatening to escalate to the Registrar of Franchises.

What We Did

We advised the franchisor, conducted a dispute analysis of both agreements, and prepared a position statement setting out a proposed boundary resolution. We facilitated a three-party mediation session and drafted supplemental territory schedules for both franchisees. No Registrar complaint was filed.

The Outcome

Both franchisees signed the revised territory schedules. The franchisor avoided a Registrar complaint, which would have been a matter of public record. The franchisor subsequently engaged us to review and tighten the territory definitions in their standard agreement template to prevent recurrence.

Case Study 03

Education Franchise — Wrongful Termination Advisory

The Situation

A franchisee operating a children's education centre received a termination notice from the franchisor alleging breach of operational standards. The franchisee disputed the factual basis of the allegations and the adequacy of the notice period given under the agreement. They approached us after receiving the notice.

What We Did

We reviewed the franchise agreement, the notice, and the underlying communications. We identified that the required cure period had not been observed and that the alleged breach had not been documented in the manner the agreement required. We responded formally to the franchisor and requested reinstatement of the agreement.

The Outcome

The franchisor withdrew the termination notice and issued a new show-cause letter following the correct procedure. The franchisee remedied the identified issues within the cure period and the agreement continued. The franchisee renewed their engagement for the following year's compliance review.

Professional Standing

Credentials & Recognitions

Bar Council Malaysia

All practitioners admitted under the Legal Profession Act 1976 and subject to the Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules

Malaysian Franchise Association

Affiliate member of the Malaysian Franchise Association (MFA), maintaining current knowledge of industry developments and regulatory updates

Franchise Act Specialists

Focused practice in franchise and licensing law since 2010, with continuing professional development in Malaysian commercial law

Dispute Resolution Panel

Practitioners with experience before the Malaysian courts and the Registrar of Franchises, across negotiation, mediation, and litigation pathways

Contact

Find Us

Address

No. 5, Jalan PJU 5/1, Dataran Sunway, Kota Damansara, 47810 PJ, Selangor

Office Hours

Mon–Fri: 9AM–6PM

Sat: 9AM–1PM

Get Started

Speak With Our Team

If you have a franchise matter you would like to discuss — whether a new registration, an agreement under negotiation, or a dispute that has already arisen — we welcome an initial enquiry.